Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Apple Signals Sea Change, Buys Siri

Today brought word that Apple bought Siri, a virtual personal assistant that I cover in detail in chapter 21 of my book. Siri CEO, Dag Kittlaus, was kind enough to grant me an interview as I prepared my manuscript. Little did I know -- or did he let on -- what was cooking behind the scenes.

WSJ has good coverage of the news. Will share my POV in next week's Search Insider column. For now, just wanted to call everyone's attention to this latest development in the Google/Apple saga. One day we'll point to this and say this was the moment Apple threw down the search gauntlet.

More on how these two are tangoing in my recent post on the Connectual blog, including a press mention in MediaPost speculating about Google's hire of a new "Developer Advocate."

Friday, April 23, 2010

Wish I Were There

Wish You Were Here



















In this week's Search Insider column, I collaborated with Frank Lee of The Search Agency to recap the highlights of the MediaPost Search Insider Summit. (Frank attended the conference in person while I monitored it live via Twitter #mpsis.)

In my last column, I shared predictions for what would have people buzzing in Captiva. Turns out I got 4/10 right -- 5 if you count Attribution as a variation of Data. Not a bad average for a major league baseball player. Not great for a guy who's been closely tracking SIS buzz for eight shows running.

Here's the blurb...

Search Insider Summit Buzz-O-Tweeter

Last week saw the annual spring migration of search geeks down to Florida for the Search Insider Summit. After attending the previous seven shows and tracking the buzz, I had to turn the reigns over to Frank Lee of The Search Agency for on-site buzz tracking -- which is very scientific, mind you -- and settle for remotely monitoring the #mpsis tweet-stream. Here are the top ten buzzwords dropped by conference attendees, with some context for each one from Frank -- and a little added commentary from me -- along with the tweet I think best captured the sentiment.
» 2 Comments


Thursday, April 15, 2010

My Search Story



If you're a regular reader/follower, you know I have a proclivity for vanity searching. Heck, my Facebook profile pic is of me in a t-shirt I made that says "Google Me." (By the way, I'm teaming up with KosherHam.com to sell a new version of these shirts as part of the promotion for my upcoming book.)

So it should come as no surprise that as soon as heard about Google letting people create their own Search Stories -- via David Berkowitz who made one of his own on ego searching -- I had to do the "Aaron Goldman" version.

Unfortunately, just a few days ago some Aaron Goldman impostor commented to the Boston Globe about layoffs in the Newton mayor's office. This bumped my quote in MediaPost from the top spot for my name on Google News to #2. I'm happy to report that I'm still #1 for every single other vertical search category on Google, though -- web search, image search, blog search, product search, and maps.

Go ahead... Google Me!

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Ad it up

Image Source

Today Twitter announced that it would soon start running ads -- or, as it calls them, "Promoted Tweets" -- on its platform.

The announcement, which was made via blog post by Twitter co-founder Biz Stone, was light on details but here are the highlights...

1. "You will start to see Tweets promoted by our partner advertisers called out at the top of some Twitter.com search results pages."

2. "Only one Promoted Tweet will be displayed on the search results page."

3. "We plan to allow Promoted Tweets to be shown by Twitter clients and other ecosystem partners and to expand beyond Twitter search, including displaying relevant Promoted Tweets in your timelines in a way that is useful to you."

4. "This is distinct from both traditional search advertising and more recent social advertising."

Indeed, Promoted Tweets are a brand new category of online advertising that doesn't fit neatly into the conventions of search or social. That said, it's by no means revolutionary. From my point of view, it's a mere tiptoe into the advertising waters to see what the response from the community will be -- that community being users and marketers alike.

It's unlikely that Promoted Tweets will piss off users given the format is very tweet-like and the placement is non-intrusive. It's unclear, however, what their response will be in terms of clicks and conversions.

As for marketers, Twitter dropped named like Starbucks, Best Buy, Virgin, and Sony as already being on board. However, it didn't share any details about how these new ad units will be priced. Are we looking at CPM? CPC? CPR (Cost-per-retweet)?

Back in September, I penned a post for the Connectual blog speculating on what the ideal Twitter ad format would look like. In turn, I offered up 4 potential formats -- In-text, Contextual in-stream, Contextual on-site, and Sponsored Hash-tags.

In that post, I implored Twitter to consider 7 lessons learned from Google as per my upcoming book. Below is a recap of each lesson from my Sept. post along with some commentary per today's announcement.

1. Relevance rules. Ads should always be targeted to the content of the tweets. And, over time, they should be tailored to individual users based on their behavior – what ads they click on, what topics do they tweet about most often, what registration data have they provided, etc.

By placing the ads in search results, for now, Twitter will presumably target Promoted Tweets to relevant queries.

2. Don’t interrupt. Twitter ads should never disrupt the experience. They should be there for people to interact with on their own terms.

As it stands, Promoted Tweets in search results are non-interruptive. We'll see what happens when Twitter moves beyond the "first phase" as Biz alludes to in his post.

3. Tap the wisdom of the crowds. Using quality-scores to determine ad effectiveness and, in turn, placement and pricing will ensure the people have a voice in what ads they see. And enticing them with contests or other rewards for interacting with ads and brands will only stimulate the almighty WOM that advertisers are hoping for.

A number of times in his post, Biz emphasizes that Promoted Tweets must "resonate" with Twitter users. He also says that "if users don't interact with a Promoted Tweet to allow us to know that the Promoted Tweet is resonating with them, such as replying to it, favoriting it, or Retweeting it, the Promoted Tweet will disappear." Indeed, it sounds like we're looking at some sort of Twitter Quality Score here.

4. Act like content. Ads should feel like tweets, be embedded in hash-tags or otherwise appear as familiar Twitter features.

Check. I'm reminded of Digg's relatively new ad format which I critiqued on this blog in October. Digg ads look just like Digg stories, save the sponsored label. Same here with Promoted Tweets.

5. Test everything. Twitter should not just try one ad format. It should experiment with multiple models and see how the ecosystem -- advertisers, agencies, users, etc. -- responds.

For now, Twitter's just testing this one format but Biz points out that this is the first execution in a much larger experiment with advertising.

6. Let the data decide. The response of Twitter users -- via feedback thru tweets and feedback thru clicks -- should determine which formats to use and which ads to show within a given format.

Check.

7. Mindset matters. Fortunately for Twitter, many people its platform to talk about brands they like and don’t like and solicit input from others. Accordingly, the mindset on Twitter is often commercial – similar to Google and unlike Facebook, where the mindset is mostly social communication and entertainment. This should bode well for advertising effectiveness.

Biz says it himself, "Like any other Tweet, the connection between you and a Promoted Tweet in real-time provides a powerful means of delivering information relevant to you at the moment."

Bottom line -- if you're a marketer wondering if Promoted Tweets are right for you, allow me to drop a few more relevant Googley Lessons...

8. Test everything

The only way to know if Twitter ads will "resonate" with your audience is to try.

9. Track everything

Marketers will have to incorporate some new metrics into their analysis -- ie, what's the value of a retweet? And, if the goal is direct response, make sure you're tracking links in tweets all the way thru to conversion like Dell.

10. Let the data decide

Just like Twitter will see how far it can continue to push the envelope with ads by seeing how the community responds, so too must marketers get past their "shiny-new-object" syndrome and only continue funding Promoted Tweets if they perform. At the same time, don't quit on them if the first tweet you promote doesn't do well. Test various messages, calls-to-action, links, etc. and let the data tell you what the right combinations are.

11. The more shelf-space, the better

Whether it's Twitter search results or user-timelines, as a marketer, the more tweets you own -- whether you paid for them or not -- on each page or stream someone's looking at, the better.

12. Don't rely on search engine marketing alone

There are only so many people searching for your brand or your category. There are plenty more seeking and discovering relevant information from the people they follow on Twitter -- as well as those they don't. Search is a great tool to capture demand. Twitter is a great tool to create it. Ignore one or the other at your own peril.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

"Final" Book Stats

Image Source

A couple weeks ago, I shared the latest numbers from my book manuscript. On 3/31 -- well, technically it was 12:08 on 4/1 -- I turned in my "final" manuscript to my publisher. Thought I'd share one last recap to let everyone know where I landed.

345 pages
3,052 paragraphs
7,232 lines
85,729 words
434,572 characters (no spaces)
518, 564 characters (with spaces)

If you do the math here, you'll see that almost half of my paragraphs are just 1 line. The goal is to make this book a quick read. It's not intended to be a cover-to-cover endeavor. Rather each chapter stands alone. With 21 chapters and an Introduction, each one averages out at 15-16 pages. If it took you longer than 30 minutes to read each chapter, I'd be surprised. Now, in each chapter, I tried to include an exercise for the reader to apply the Googley Lesson to his/her business. So the goal is certainly to have you think about each chapter for more than 30 minutes but it shouldn't take you much more than that to get through the copy itself.

Currently, the manuscript is in the very capable hands of my editor at McGraw-Hill. From there it goes to a development editor and a copyeditor. At that point, I'll have a chance to review their edits and make any last ones of my own. Then it's off to layout and production for an 8/20 release!

For now, it's back to more regular posting here and on the Connectual blog -- not to mention the other blogs I've been neglecting over the past 3-4 months -- as I still have the writing itch and plenty more time to spend scratching!



Thursday, April 8, 2010

Buzz Lightweek?


In yesterday's Search Insider column, I offered up a preview for next week's Search Insider Summit, a conference that I've attended each of the past 7 times but will be missing next week due to family commitments.

At each SIS, I track the Buzz-o-Meter -- the ten most popular buzzwords dropped by speakers and attendees. In this column, I recap that past 7 lists and take a stab at predicting what will have people buzzing next week.

We'll see if my predictions come true or if it turns out to be a buzz-light week.

Here's the blurb...

Captiva Weather Report: Sunny, Warm, And Chance of Buzz

Next week, many of my friends and colleagues will be descending upon Captiva Island, Fla. for the biannual Search Insider Summit. In today's column, I'll share the results from the past seven summits to see what trends we can identify and help people "skate where the puck is going" or, more appropriately, "sail where the boat will be" in Captiva.
» 3 Comments




Sunday, March 28, 2010

Who's Counting?

Image Source

As stated in my previous Search Insider column -- What Assorted Marketing All-Stars Learned From Google -- the goal for my last installment was to catch the Duggars.

Last week's column -- What 19 Marketers Learned From Google -- squared me up with them, parents and grand-children excluded. Not sure how Michelle did it. My interviews each took only 30-40 minutes, not weeks!

Won't spend much time previewing or pontificating here. My manuscript deadline is 3/31 so it's crunch-time. And, being the glutton for punishment I am, I decided last week to add a 21st chapter titled, "Future-proofing" to discuss what's coming in the next 10-ish years for Google, and marketing in general, along with some tips to help readers prepare.

In my last blog post -- Got It Covered -- I shared some stats on word-count and such in addition to the cover art. Here are the updated figured -- again, pending a few last holes to fill and all the publisher edits yet to come...

Pages: 335
Words: 83,233
Characters (no spaces): 415,942
Characters (with spaces): 497,517
Paragraphs: 2,907
Lines: 6,935

And here's the blurb from my column...

What 19 Marketers Learned From Google

This is the sixth and final column in a series I've been publishing in MediaPost featuring excerpts of interviews I've conducted while writing my book, "Everything I Know About Marketing I Learned From Google." Today, I'll share 140-character-or-less responses from 19 marketing gurus regarding the most important thing they learned from Google.
» 1 Comments

Starting next week I get back to regular posting and bylines -- which means more often and less book-y!

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Got It Covered

Everything I Know About Marketing I Learned From GoogleVery excited to share the cover art for my book. This was created by McGraw-Hill and has some extra white space for glowing endorsements. :)

As far as the manuscript goes, today I cranked out the 20th and last chapter. I'm not done quite yet as there are a few gaps in each chapter that still need to be filled with research, interviews, etc. But, for the most part, the content is complete!

I'm very proud of what I've put together. I think it will make a very interesting, informative, entertaining, and provocative read. I've been very humbled by the support I've received from friends, family, colleagues, blog/byline readers, etc.

And I'm very fortunate to have been granted time and consideration from some 100+ industry luminaries who all participated in Q&A with me to help me prepare the manuscript. Excerpts of those interviews have been running in my Search Insider column and I plan to share more on my soon-to-be newly-designed book site, GoogleyLessons.com, which is scheduled to launch in April or May.

I'm also grateful to the good folks at Elevate Studios for letting me bunker-down in their offices the past few months where I can write in peace and especially for putting up with my machine-gun typing and frantic pacing.

OK, that's enough thanking. Gotta save something for the acknowledgements and dedication!

The book itself will be released August 20-ish but is now available for pre-sale on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Borders. I trust you'll find it's the best $17.79, $18.18, or $26.95 you've ever spent!

Here are some quick stats on what I've assembled. (Note: as mentioned above, I still have to plug in some holes and my editors have yet to work their magic. In all likelihood, these figures will get trimmed down quite a bit.)

Pages: 303
Words: 75,571
Characters (no spaces): 375,601
Characters (with spaces): 449,650
Paragraphs: 2,645
Lines: 6,286

(Yes, I've got it saved and backed up in triplicate!)

Look forward to putting this puppy to bed and getting back to biz and blogging! Thanks for your interest and, again, your support!


Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Kickin' It with the Marketing All-Stars

Chuck Taylor All StarsImage Source

In today's Search Insider column I culled my book interviews to catch some quick commentary from a collection of colorful characters. This is my second-to-last column before I come out of hiding at the end of the month and resume original writing.

Over the next three weeks though, I'm looking at a wedding in NY, conference in SF, week vacation in Cancun, and, oh yeah, a book deadline of 3/31 for McGraw-Hill! As I told my colleague, Glenn Fishback of Adify, yesterday, I only know one speed. Giddyup!

What Assorted Marketing All-Stars Learned From Google

This is the fifth in a series of columns I'm publishing in MediaPost featuring excerpts of interviews I've conducted while writing my book, "Everything I Know About Marketing I Learned From Google," Previous installments included a double feature with Paul Gunning and John Battelle. Like the Octomom or the Gosselins, there's no turning back after your first set of multiples -- so, today, I'll offer up 11 marketing all-stars weighing in on the same theme: What makes Google such a unique company? Why has it been so successful?
» 1 Comments

Sunday, March 7, 2010

OMMA Gawd, This is Gonna Be Good!

OMMA Global SF
In a couple weeks, I'll be moderating a panel at OMMA Global in San Francisco. This conference is put on by MediaPost and, for the first time, track sessions will be free to the public.

Rather than sharing the topics and questions for my panel in the rear -- like I did for last week's CIMA event -- I thought I'd put 'em out in advance so people can get a sense for what we'll be covering and weigh in with feedback prior to the session.

Now I can check the buzzwords "transparency" and "crowd-sourcing" off my to-do list. (Speaking of transparency, I should point out that I'm compensated by MediaPost for programming the search track of this conference.)

Below is the prep sheet I just fired off to my panel. I'll be sure to update this post after the session with the highlights. Meanwhile, let me know what else you think we should hit on.

And, if you happen to be at the event, instead of Buzzword Bingo, we're gonna play Freestyle Fodder. Print out this post and keep track of how many Q's I actually ask versus ad-lib.

OMMA Global
Marriott Marquis
55 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA

March 18, 2010
11:30am

Is Your Company Spending Too Much on Search?

Search may be the last click for customers who are buying what you have to sell. But that click often comes at the end of the consumer’s online marketing journey -- which includes exposure to banners, video ads, mobile messages and various other marketing techniques. Up to now, search has gotten much of the credit -- and the budget -- for making the sale. Smart search experts, however, recognize they don’t operate in a void, and more of them are studying and reporting how their discipline works in conjunction with other forms of marketing. They believe that by showing you the impact of marketing dollars spent "upstream," they can accurately address if your company is spending too much or too little on search. Others, however, are not so sure. This panel will discuss the unpredictable effects of search’s evolving upstream approach. Could it be a minefield for the search industry or will search finally step into the role as your strategic adviser? Find out what you have to gain either way.

Panelists:

Chad Baldwin, VP, Sales, North America, Kenshoo

Gerry Bavaro, VP, Managing Director, Resolution Media

Mike Moran, Chief Strategist, Converseon

Esco Strong, Director, Analytics, Microsoft Advertising

Moderator:

Aaron Goldman, Managing Partner, Connectual

Questions for the Panel

(Note: I will not get to all of these and won’t ask them in this order so be ready to improvise with me!)

Update 3/19: Well, I made it through half the Q's. See below in italics for choice sound-bytes from the panel. All in all, it was a great session. Thanks to my panelists for sharing their wisdom and to everyone who turned out in the audience!

Role of Search in the Mix

Before we can talk about proper budget allocation between search and other channels, I think we need to talk about the role of search in the marketing and media mix. Now, of course, this will be different for each marketer but give our audience a framework for how to think about the role search can play for their business? What part of the purchase funnel does search address?

Chad: Over 50% of new customer acquisition comes from search

Gerry: Search is part of a long trail. (AG: Hopefully it’s a happy trail!) You have to walk before you run.

Mike: Search is not a tool, it’s a moment in time. You don’t ask what the role of the telephone was in driving sales, do you?

When we talk about “spending too much on search,” we can be referring to many different things -- media costs for paid search, labor costs for natural search, technology costs for both and, certainly, opportunity costs for both. How does the approach to this conversation change if we’re talking about paid search or SEO? Or does it not change at all?

Gerry: Think about bucketing media into paid, earned and owned

Chad: Need to track every single event to conversion

Esco: It’s not about asking if I spend too much on search, it’s am I spending it in the right way or am I spending enough on other channels?

Mike: When it comes to SEO, many people don’t think about it until after they build the website. That’s like building a house and saying, “OK, now we need to figure out the plumbing.”

Big Picture

Mike reminds us that before we get into discussing advanced attribution modeling, we need to consider that most businesses that sell their products and services offline can’t tell what happened online to result in a sale. What are some basic best practices for these companies?

Mike: Too many clients think, “We went into marketing to get away from the math.” Don’t focuse on numbers, focus on answers or insights.

Best Practices

As we move into the online arena, where tracking is most robust, it’s clearly a challenge to isolate the impact each touchpoint has on your brand from search to display to social to mobile. How does one get started on building a basic attribution model?

Mike: Do it wrong, quickly. Whatever you do will be better than doing nothing.

Once you have a working model and data coming in, what’s the best way to analyze and act on that data? Is it just about redistributing credit for sales? Or are there other ways to apply this data?

What’s the biggest challenge to getting attribution right?

What’s the biggest mistake you see people make when it comes to attribution and budget allocation?

Can you share some examples of companies that have successfully created and applied attribution models to drive more marketing ROI? What typically happens to the credit for sales that search gets in these situations? More, less, same?

Players

Who needs to be involved in the allocation and attribution conversation? Which departments internally within the corporation? Which external partners? From an agency standpoint, who needs to be involved?

Mike: as few people as possible!

Ultimately, who should have ownership?

Tools

What tools and technologies are available for marketers and agencies looking to determine the proper budget allocation and attribution models for their business?

Chad: it’s a statistical problem. At Kenshoo (alert: sales plug!), we have PhD's working on technologies that can help solve it.

Will we ever get to the point where we can take people out of the equation and the technology can “do it all?”

Esco: it’s equal parts art and science.

Future

How do you think the attribution conversation will change in the coming years?

In 5 years, what will we be talking about on panels like this at conferences? Will we still have attribution and allocation panels at conferences?

Audience Q: How do you get everyone at the table to tackle these thorny issues?

AG: Free food!


Related Posts with Thumbnails