Thursday, July 29, 2010

Googley Haiku


Image Source

I've often compared writing search ad copy to conjuring Haiku. Those darn specs can be infuriating! Every time I pen one of these columns I'm reminded how valuable good search copywriters are.

So Few Characters.
Want To Add More Nouns And Verbs.
And Here Is The Blurb...

The New Haiku -- 2010 Edition

Anytime I find myself in a pinch for column fodder, I know I can always fall back on a little Search Haiku. It's not as exciting as covering the search news blotter, but hopefully it will still be as entertaining for you. So here is a fresh new installment of rhymes adding to my collection from '06 and '09.
» 9 Comments

Monday, July 26, 2010

Tomorrow's Buzzword: Media Design


Faithful followers know I have a soft spot for buzzwords. While some people loathe them for their overuse and inability to really say anything, I heart them for their ability to give us a common language and describe (even if generically) emerging concepts.

One phrase that hasn't gotten much attention to date is "Media Design." Why? Well, quite simply it hasn't been really introduced. One man is out to change that, though.

Saneel Radia (not pictured above), formerly of Improv Olympic Chicago fame, is the recently appointed Director of Media Innovation at BBH Labs. His role there? Essentially, bringing the idea of "Media Design" to fruition after incubating it for the past few years at Denuo.

So what is Media Design? I have to admit, it took me a while to grasp the concept. Not because it's invalid or unimportant, but because it's a true paradigm-shifter. Yikes, there I go with the buzzwords again!

As Saneel puts it, Media Design represents "the missing skills within the advertising agency creative departments." In fact, that's the subtitle of Saneel's thesis completed in July of '09 for his MBA in Creative Leadership at the Berlin School.

The 70+ page paper -- which Saneel was kind enough to share with me -- makes the case (successfully, I might add) for the importance of Media Design as a discipline and the Media Designer as a critical role within creative shops.

With Saneel's permission, I'm posting the excerpts from his thesis that most resonated with me. As you read these, you can see how Saneel's thoughtfulness and ability to produce punchy soundbytes may have been shaped by his mentor and Denuo founder, Rishad Tobaccowala.

---

On the connectedness of today's consumers:

"When the world was dominated by a traditional media model, advertisers had two major advantages when engaging consumers. First, the vast majority of media consumption occurred from a single source: the content creator. In other words, as television networks broadcasted content, most people who consumed this content were receiving the broadcast, rather than receiving it from a third party. Thus, brand messages needed only to be placed within content moving linearly from a single origin to engage the vast majority of users. In fact, the relationship between the content itself and the ad message placed within it was a secondary or tertiary consideration, with the primary concern being what demographic audience was consuming the content. Of course, a relationship has always existed; audiences tend to follow loose patterns (e.g., sports content is consumed primarily by male viewers), but the content itself rarely prevented brand message insertion."

On the social media model:

"First, it means brands are actually competing for attention with the very consumers they are attempting to engage. Second, in a new media model, consumers are clearly in control. They create the content, decide who and what they connect with, and generally outline the rules of those engagements."

"If a brand’s message or experience isn’t easily portable, doesn’t provide any natural reason for consumers to share it amongst themselves, or doesn’t live organically within the new social media model, the brand is drastically handicapping its messaging potential."

On the need for non-standard creative ideation:

"The experience can simply not be standardized as it was in traditional media. Thus, it does not exist in most ad agencies because they are built to deliver creative ideas in standardized environments."

On the need for new media creative ideas to evolve:

"When crafting creative ideas limited to traditional environments, agencies rarely had to think about the experience as anything other than a message; it was up to the client to provide service and responses, in many cases, not even the same individual responsible for marketing."

On the misprioritization of technology:

"The issue though is that technologies are downstream in the creative process and primarily impact how an idea manifests or how users experience it; they rarely determine if the creative idea itself is an effective platform to engage a brand’s target consumers."

Quoting Hashem Bawja, former New Media Director at Goodby Silverstein:

"Regardless of how the engagement has changed, the best creative ideas are still the ones built from a true and compelling insight into people's lives."

On why creative agencies employ antiquated models:

"The answer can of course be found by following the profits. As traditional creative departments have become less profitable over the last fifteen years, they’ve relied more and more heavily on marking up production to drive profits. As the FTE model has continued to yield lower blended hourly retainer rates while agency compensation for employees has increased, the profit margin has eroded significantly. In other words, clients are spending a smaller percentage of budgets on retaining Creatives in relation to their investment in media and digital production. As stated above, digital creative departments integrate production into their process; this has allowed agencies to establish profit by producing executions in house."

"Any client that listens to an agency attempt to sell a creative idea that requires in-house production at the agency should immediately consider the validity of the recommendation. Is the agency truly attempting to help drive the brand’s business forward, or is it attempting to drive its own?"

On the shift from branded micro-sites to social media:

"The reason is clear: consumers are spending more time in these environments and they tend to be in exploratory mindsets as they surf profiles and updates. It’s much easier to engage a consumer looking for something to do than one in the middle of an objective that must be lured to a micro-site via a banner ad."

On understanding the Media Design concept:

"First, a new frame of reference is needed about the output of creative departments, specifically differentiating ideas vs. their executions. Next, the lines around what constitutes advertising must be redrawn and blurred to some degree as the traditional lines between product, advertising and experience are simply not clear within most new media."

On the role of creative agencies:

"Creative departments are in the ideas business."

"Today’s creative ideas must be broader, more flexible, more modular, utilitarian, and more diverse."

On the role of the Media Designer:

"Philosophically, Media Designers do not approach media as containers for the placement of uniform executions of ideas, as was highly efficient in a traditional media model. Instead, Media Designers view media as a canvas upon which are ideas are placed. More accurately, media is a collection of unique canvases, each of which has a dramatic and distinct impact on the creative manifestation itself."

"The Media Designer's primary tool is 'media' itself, of all types and formats... 'Media' is defined as any environment, virtual or physical, in which consumers may engage brands."

"Media Designers understand channel impact on content."

"Media Designers leverage media as a consumer lens... One key skill set of the Media Designer is the ability to use media as an input as adeptly as he or she uses it as an output."

"Media Designers craft media-scalable ideas. One clear distinction when approaching media as a canvas vs. as a container is understanding the striations of users across a medium and engaging them differently to maximize a creative idea’s potential. For example, YouTube receives about 89 million unique users a month [as of May 2009]. A 'container' philosophy sees this as the total possible universe reachable via advertising on YouTube. However, the audience itself can be cut an infinite number of ways, many of which will yield different outcomes based on variations on the same creative idea."

On Burger King's Whopper Sacrifice Facebook App:

"The creative idea's relationship with its medium was circular."

On why Media Design is such a foreign concept to creative shops:

"The issue currently though is that not enough relevant skills exist in most creative departments to ensure relevant conception, primarily because of the void resulting from an absence in media sensibility."

On why the industry is ripe for Media Design:

"The model is appropriate for agencies now that brand engagement has been so dramatically impacted by the new media revolution. It weaves media into the fabric of the original idea, the key reason most work is rejected by consumers today."

On managing expectations:

"Media Design is not intended as a panacea for any agency, but it certainly provides a tangible and achievable set of expertise that must be secured, then deployed as appropriate in the environment of that particular agency. In order to be successful, most agencies will require some form of reinvention. Media Design is proposed as a key step in that reinvention process for the majority of agencies around the globe."

---

Can you imagine Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce employing Media Designers? Me neither. That's one of the many reasons why SCDP would not be flourishing in today's ad world. (I'd imagine health care and HR costs would be among the others).

Media Design is both revolutionary and evolutionary. It's an approach built to manage the complexities of today's digital world while paying homage to the tried and true principles of successful advertising that have proven to work over the years across shifts in media, technology, and culture.

It will be very interesting to see how long it takes for the Media Design concept to catch on in creative agencies. I do believe it's a matter of "when" not "if" though. And, "if" it doesn't happen at Bartle Bogle Hegarty, look for Radia Goldman coming soon to a mad ave near you.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Google Me: Why Ask Why?

















In today's Search Insider column, I pick up where I left off 2 weeks ago and dissect Google's social media ambitions.

So why is Google so keen on building a large-scale social network? The answer's not as rhetorical as you might think.

Here's the blurb...

Why Google Me

The world may not need another social network. But Google does. Google needs a place where people can easily congregate and communicate. A place that's as easy to understand and use as Google.com. A place that people "like." Why?
» 2 Comments

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Are you a "User?"

UsersImage Source

Pet Peeve:

I hate when people are referred to as "users" in a marketing context.

"We protect the privacy of Web users!"

"We design our products with users in mind!"

Whenever I hear that term, I think of the guy in this picture.

Have I seen Trainspotting and Requiem for a Dream too many times? Maybe. But I'm sure I'm not alone here.

When you're speaking/writing/blogging about marketing, I'm sure this is the last image you want people conjuring up. Unless the audience segment you're referring to are actual drug users.

Website visitors are not users. Your customers are not users. Media consumers are not users. Your target audience is not users (unless you sell syringes). They are all PEOPLE.

So let's start calling a spade a spade.

"We protect the privacy of people on the Web!"

"We design our products with people in mind!"

Sounds better, right?

Let's not forget we're in the people business, not the marketing business.

Rant over.

Got Those Marketing Blues?

Chicago BluesImage Source

Are you suffering from the marketing blues? Do you live in Chicago?

Well, you're in luck. One of companies I consult for is singing your tune.

Resolution Media, a leading digital marketing agency under the Omnicom (and also my happy home for nearly 5 years) is hosting a great event at the House of Blues on 7/22 for local area marketers, director level and up.

For more details and RSVP info, visit the Resolution Media website. Hope to see you there!

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Google Who?

Woe is me for having branded myself (and my wife) with the Google Me moniker. As rumors fly over a Google social network named Google Me, I'm ducking for cover from Google's lawyers (would they really come after someone who just wrote a book singing their praises!?!) and frantically planning modifications to my t-shirt line (available today via KosherHam.com -- get 'em while they're hot... and legal!)

In last week's Search Insider column, I touch on Google Me (the network, not the shirt... well, ok, the shirt too!) in the context of Facebook's move to use the social graph to influence search results. Will flesh out the Google Me piece more in next week's column.

Here's the blurb...

Link Vs. Like And The Future Of Web Ranking

There's been a lot of discussion about the ongoing fight for Web supremacy between Google and Facebook but, to date, the debate has centered around matters like privacy and metrics like page views and ad dollars. In the past week, however, it appears both companies are taking direct aim at the heart of the other's core business. First, AllFacebook.com reported that Facebook launched an "open graph search engine." Then, Kevin Rose sent the blogosphere into, well, the stratosphere with a tweet suggesting that a new Google social network called "Google Me" is imminent. In today's column, I'll dissect Facebook's search aspirations.
» 2 Comments

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Digital Advertising Technology Landscape

This schematic has become my cheat-sheet of choice for making sense of the digital advertising technology landscape...


Source: Terence Kawaja, LUMA Partners via Slideshare

From my perspective, the take-away here is that the digital marketing ecosystem continues to fragment by the day as innovative firms find new ways to create value. In turn, the challenge is that each bucket that pops up adds another layer between the advertiser and the consumer (and another potential point of confusion for marketers getting hip, or trying to stay hip, to digital).

It's interesting to see how many buckets Google is active in through owned/operated properties. At my count (based on the original schematic below, not the updated one posted above) the Big G has a play in 9 of them:

DSP - Invite Media
Ad Exchange - DoubleClick AdX
Ad Networks - Google Content Network
Creative Optimization - Teracent
Ad Servers - DoubleClick
Analytics - Google Analytics
Mobile - AdMob



Display Advertising Technology Landscape

And, of course, since this chart only shows the "display advertising technology landscape," it doesn't include Video (YouTube), Search (Google) and all the other Google products.

Methinks it's only a matter of time before advertisers will be able to just go through Google to get to their audience and check all the boxes and buckets along the way.

In 5-10 years, the digital advertising landscape could look very well like this...


Display Advertising Landscape - Google
And, I suppose it's possible publishers could even be dis-intermediated too!

Now, surely, this outcome might cause some concern for marketers over Google having access to all the data, potentially fixing pricing, etc. But I think the benefits of centralization, simplification, and efficiency will outweigh the cons for 98% of the 5 million-ish advertisers that currently work with Google today. For the other 2% (big Internet retailers, Fortune 500's, etc.), there will still be a need for either a) agencies to act as their advocates or b) internal teams that will put all these pieces and buckets together themselves.

And, while the 2% may control a good 20% of the total digital advertising spend, that's a healthy 80% ripe for Google's picking. My bet is Dennis Woodside, Penry Price, Jim Lecinski, and the other Google ad sales big wigs have this cheat-sheet affixed to their desks as well.

Update 7/27: Just came across a great post by Doug Weaver on his blog, The Drift, reacting to this graphic. He likens the state of today's overcrowded display advertising technology landscape to 2 hobos slicing a bean. Rather than introducing "one more data source that's going to refine targeting by a quarter of a point" or "another technology or platform to shave a nickel off the CPM," Weaver urges us to focus on finding/creating companies that will create "new online wealth."

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Who's Ready to Get Googley?!?




















Image Source

Gotta love that old Snickers ad. "Hey, that's great but who are the Chefs?!?"

Yesterday saw the new website launch for my Google book, Everything I Know about Marketing I Learned from Google, at GoogleyLessons.com.

I'm very pleased with how it came out and must tip my hat again to the good folks at Elevate Studios for the amazing work.

The site is full of content including executive summaries of each chapter, the full text of nearly every interview I conducted while researching the book, as well as the complete book introduction. There's also a blog where I plan to share behind-the-scenes tidbits as well as keep everyone updated on news and info related to the book and its subjects.

One of my main goals for the site is to make reading the book a more interactive experience. Throughout the book I included URLs for people to click on e-readers and/or type in to their browsers to get more context for a particular topic. And I set up specific URLs for each chapter for readers to share thoughts and exchange ideas with others.

My hope is that the book will become much more than the paper -- and, as the case may be, digital ink -- it's printed on. As noted in Chapter 17, "Show of Your Assets," it's always a best practice to extend the shelf life of your products through digital asset creation and distribution. This website is one small way I'm looking to practice what I preach. Other tactics include a promotional video I'm shooting tomorrow along with a blog tour around the book release date (which is set for 8/27, btw) -- both of which were concepted and being executed by my publisher, McGraw-Hill.

When you have a few minutes -- or hours -- to spare, please check out the Googley Lessons website and, if you haven't already, pre-order the book and engage in the conversation.

And, if you like the shirt below better than the one up above, feel free to pick one up -- choose from 20 color combinations! -- through my pals at KosherHam.com.




Remember, Googley is as Googley does. And who doesn't want to get Googley every now and then?!?

Google's Invitation to SEM VIPs

Image Source

In today's Search Insider column, I invite those in the SEM community to RSVP to Google's proposition to buy online display media in a more search-like manner through its latest acquisition, Invite Media.

I didn't touch on this in the column but another interesting thread related to the Invite Media deal is that Google now owns an ad network and ad exchange as well as an ad server (DoubleClick) and demand side platform (Invite) that can be used to buy inventory (and see rates among other data) across other (non-Google) networks and exchanges.

Nat Turner, Invite Media CEO, himself said that this was a huge conflict of interest just a few short months ago. In his guest post on AdExchanger.com about "True DSPs", he wrote...

"A true DSP must remain neutral and have zero allegiances to any publishers, exchanges, data providers or other vendors. A true DSP should embody the word 'platform' and not just be conduit or pretty interface to a pre-existing business."

And, as if that didn't make it clear enough, he went on to say...

"The DSP should not, under any circumstances, own or operate an ad network. This is in direct conflict with the neutrality aspect."

Will be interesting to see how this is resolved.

Meanwhile, here's the blurb from my column...

Google Invites SEM Attributes To Display

In the display world, Google has fared pretty well of late. YouTube will turn a profit this year. And the Google Content Network enjoys 80% reach globally, becoming a staple on most every media plan that includes online ad networks. And Google's success in display can be largely attributed to incorporating key features of SEM.
» Comments

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Googley Tube

Google TV

In yesterday's Search Insider column I pontificate on the ideal ad format for Google TV.

As you might guess, I advocate for taking lessons learned from SEM and applying them to the big screen.

Let's hope Google doesn't act like a bunch of n00bs when incorporating ads onto the boob tube.

Here's the blurb....

What Will Ads Look Like On Google TV?

As many of you know, Google introduced Google TV a couple of weeks ago at its I/O developer conference. Details have been posted via Google blog post , intro video, and developer guide. Conspicuously missing, though, was any information about advertising via Google TV. So, on the off chance Google hasn't yet figured out the proper ad format for Google TV, I thought I'd share some suggestions.
» 4 Comments
Related Posts with Thumbnails